tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4259215746272258176.post2468134179963042848..comments2014-08-02T16:32:56.049+01:00Stuart Parr[email protected]Blogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4259215746272258176.post-87811849144041797022010-01-13T18:42:07.330Z2010-01-13T18:42:07.330ZKai the Chernobyl &quot;disaster&quot; only happened because Soviet politicians were playing with the toy against the wishes of the engineers. Granted that design is not of the sort of belt, braces, 2nd set of braces, man with a red flag employed to hold up trowsers, giant kiddie walker attached to belt, crane overhead holding braces sort we enjoy but it is but it is very very safe compared to, say, having gas in your house.<br /><br />The closure is nothing to do with safety it is simply Luddism.<br /><br />And incidentaly the Chernobyl &quot;disaster&quot; killed 53 people making it safer than the MRSA &quot;disaster&quot; in Britain&#39;s hospitals each &amp; every week that we hear so much about.neil craighttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09157898238945726349[email protected]tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4259215746272258176.post-76188613777774317852009-12-31T14:42:15.368Z2009-12-31T14:42:15.368Z<b>Kai</b><br /><br />And the difference between that accident and Three Mile Island is...?Animal Magichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11540149699251861235[email protected]tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4259215746272258176.post-50775231010398751332009-12-31T14:34:02.647Z2009-12-31T14:34:02.647ZAnimal magic; <br /><br />Check your facts. <br /><br />The design of the control rods played a crucial part in the chain reaction which subsequently led to the accident. In addition the plant (yup, even in Ignalia) lacks the sort of hard containment nuclear plants in the western world usually have. <br /><br />By your logic no nuclear accident could have happened as one would very much expect that everything is always as its supposed to be.Kaihttp://kaibackstrom.com[email protected]tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4259215746272258176.post-7166056074138611262009-12-31T14:15:41.071Z2009-12-31T14:15:41.071Z<b>Kai</b><br /><br />I would very much expect that the Lithanian plant has been adequately maintained (unlike Chernobyl). By your logic we should shut down all PWRs reactors because of the accident at Three Mile Island.Animal Magichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11540149699251861235[email protected]tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4259215746272258176.post-38229672227608169192009-12-31T13:35:39.006Z2009-12-31T13:35:39.006ZThe Ignalia 22 y old RBMK-1500 plant has the same construction as the Chernobyl reactors, a construction which made the disaster of 1986 possible. <br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster<br /><br />Do your really think that the risk of something similar happening would be worth taking?Kaihttp://kaibackstrom.com[email protected]tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4259215746272258176.post-31778985885832932822009-12-31T11:33:22.478Z2009-12-31T11:33:22.478ZThat&#39;s what they&#39;ve got planned for the UK as well.Mark Wadsworthhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07733511175178098449[email protected]